No more than 100 words, if exceeds it will count as part of the essay. State briefly the issue and the stakeholders.
Discussion/analysis of interview
Comparison between two interviews, need to explain.
At least one supporting example for explain
Reflection on the interview
MUST connect the interviews to the original portfolio research. New idea/relationship/perspective that is NOT MENTIONED in the interview or portfolio must be established/explained.
example:
"After comparing the interview(s) and the original portfolio my understanding of the issue/impacts/solutions is NOW changed/improved..."
Provide new solution that is not considered in the portfolio or interview.
Projection of broader implications
This is not summary or conclusion! Do NOT repeat materials unless in support opinion. Look Beyond, think about the future of the issue. Give Opinion - "In my opinion, I think that ..."
Opinion can be about aspects/effects, future implications, recommendation for the future and evaluation.
[ add comment ] | permalink |
( 0 / 0 )N Discussion and analysis of the interview
Level
0 The student has not achieved level 1.
1 The student describes the interview and refers to the summary of the interview.
2 The student discusses the interview and refers to the summary of the interview with some analysis.
3 The student discusses the interview and refers to the summary of the interview with extensive analysis.
O Reflection on the interview
Level
0 Level 1 is not achieved.
1 An attempt has been made to relate ideas arising from the interview to the portfolio
research.
2 There is some reflection on ideas arising from the interview and applied to the portfolio research with supportive examples.
3 There is an extensive reflection on ideas arising from the interview and applied to the
portfolio research with supportive examples.
4 There is an extensive reflection on ideas arising from the interview and applied to the portfolio research with supportive examples and new relationships are established.
P Projection of broader implications from the interview and
portfolio research
Level
0 The student has not achieved level 1.
1 An attempt has been made to project implications as a result of the interview or the
portfolio research.
2 There is some projection of implications as a result of the interview or the portfolio
research.
3 There is some projection of implications as a result of the interview and the portfolio
research with supportive examples.
4 There is an extensive projection of implications as a result of the interview and portfolio
research with supportive examples.
Q Interview process
Level Appropriateness of the choice of the interviewee
0 The choice of interviewee is not appropriate.
1 The choice of interviewee is appropriate.
Level Appropriateness of the interview questions
0 There is no record of the interview questions.
1–2 The interview questions are partially appropriate.
3 The interview questions are appropriate.
Level Comprehensive record of the interview(s)
0 There is no record of the interview(s).
1–2 There is a partial record of the interview(s).
3 There is a comprehensive record of the interview(s).
R Quality of communication
Level
0 The student has not achieved level 1.
1 The student expresses arguments in a coherent or structured manner.
2 The student expresses arguments in a coherent and structured manner.
[ add comment ] | permalink |
( 0 / 0 )Assessment Criteria for the HL Portfolio Extension
The portfolio extension is assessed against five criteria that are related to the objectives of the HL ITGS course.
Criterion N Discussion and analysis of the interview 3 marks
Criterion O Reflection on the interview 4 marks
Criterion P Projection of broader implications from the interview
and portfolio research 4 marks
Criterion Q Interview process
• Appropriateness of the choice of the interviewee
• Appropriateness of the interview questions
• Comprehensive record of the interview(s) 7 marks
Criterion R Quality of communication 2 marks
Total 20 marks
N Discussion and analysis of the interview
Level
0 The student has not achieved level 1.
1 The student describes the interview and refers to the summary of the interview.
2 The student discusses the interview and refers to the summary of the interview with some analysis.
3 The student discusses the interview and refers to the summary of the interview with extensive analysis.
O Reflection on the interview
Level
0 Level 1 is not achieved.
1 An attempt has been made to relate ideas arising from the interview to the portfolio research.
2 There is some reflection on ideas arising from the interview and applied to the portfolio research with supportive examples.
3 There is an extensive reflection on ideas arising from the interview and applied to the portfolio research with supportive examples.
4 There is an extensive reflection on ideas arising from the interview and applied to the portfolio research with supportive examples and new relationships are established.
P Projection of broader implications from the interview and
portfolio research
Level
0 The student has not achieved level 1.
1 An attempt has been made to project implications as a result of the interview or the
portfolio research.
2 There is some projection of implications as a result of the interview or the portfolio
research.
3 There is some projection of implications as a result of the interview and the portfolio
research with supportive examples.
4 There is an extensive projection of implications as a result of the interview and portfolio research with supportive examples.
Q Interview process
Level Appropriateness of the choice of the interviewee
0 The choice of interviewee is not appropriate.
1 The choice of interviewee is appropriate.
Level Appropriateness of the interview questions
0 There is no record of the interview questions.
1–2 The interview questions are partially appropriate.
3 The interview questions are appropriate.
Level Comprehensive record of the interview(s)
0 There is no record of the interview(s).
1–2 There is a partial record of the interview(s).
3 There is a comprehensive record of the interview(s).
R Quality of communication
Level
0 The student has not achieved level 1.
1 The student expresses arguments in a coherent or structured manner.
2 The student expresses arguments in a coherent and structured manner.
[ add comment ] | permalink |
( 0 / 0 )
Calendar
